Platform-first or asset-first? Comparing Australia’s DAF and the US CLARITY Act

The CLARITY Act just cleared the US Senate Banking Committee 15-9.

Putting it next to Australia's Digital Assets Framework Act is worth a look. Both are trying to bring digital asset markets inside the regulatory perimeter. They're just doing it very differently.

Australia regulates the platform.

Our DAF Act brings exchanges, custodians, and intermediaries into the financial services regime. They need an AFSL. The rules apply to the platform, not to the underlying asset.

What it doesn't do is reclassify the tokens. Is this token a security? A financial product? Those questions still run through Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act and ASIC's INFO 225.

CLARITY tackles the asset head on.

The US bill creates a new category called “digital commodity.” It sets a test for when a blockchain is “mature” enough for an asset to move from SEC oversight to CFTC oversight. Classify the asset first, and everything else flows from there.

Two roads to the same destination.

Platform-first gives you consistent rules for anyone holding client funds. It doesn't matter which token. Asset-first gives you certainty about what each token is. But you have to figure that out token by token.

Each approach reflects what each jurisdiction was already set up to do. Australia leans on the existing Corporations Act and adds a platform overlay. The US is using new legislation to settle a jurisdictional fight that has been running for years.

Neither is finished. The US still has to address platform-level conduct, custody, and surveillance. For us, the question is whether ASIC's platform rules and Chapter 7's asset tests fit together cleanly, or whether the seams between them become the new battleground.

At BTC Markets, our markets licence application is built for exactly this environment.

One thing I keep coming back to. When you regulate the platform but not the asset, where does the classification work end up sitting?

For more updates, follow me on LinkedIn.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this page is issued by BTC Markets Pty Ltd (BTC Markets, we, us, our). The information is general only and is not intended to constitute an opinion or recommendation with respect to its contents. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Any reference to past performance is intended to be for general illustrative purposes only. The information cannot be relied upon for any purposes and is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice.

The information does not purport to be complete, accurate or contain all of the information that a person may require to make a decision. It may also contain forward looking statements, which are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors. We recommend you obtain professional advice before making any decision with respect to the matters discussed in this document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, BTC Markets will have no liability for any loss or liability of any kind: (i) arising in respect of the information contained (or not contained) on this page; or (ii) arising from a person relying on any information or statement contained on this page. The information provided is only intended for recipients in Australia. This information cannot be reproduced without our prior written permission.